Cookie Preferences

When you visit websites, they may store or retrieve data in your browser. This storage is often necessary for the basic functionality of the website.

Accept All Cookies
Close
Cookies on this website

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

Drata Alternatives

Top Drata Alternatives — Find the Right Compliance Automation Fit

BalkanID Logo Icon

Drata is a leading name in compliance automation software, trusted for streamlining SOC2, ISO, and HIPAA compliance. However, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. As organizations mature, needs around identity governance, user access reviews (UAR), and risk-based workflows often outpace Drata’s core offerings. If you’re seeking a platform that aligns more closely with your tech stack, audit requirements, or risk posture, you’re in the right place.

Explore these alternatives to find the compliance automation software that fits your organization’s unique needs.

Why Look for a Drata Alternative?

While Drata excels in compliance automation, users often seek alternatives for reasons such as:

Limited identity governance: Focuses more on compliance signals than on deep entitlement reviews.
Restricted access review workflows: Lacks robust multi-level or delegated UAR capabilities.
No dedicated UAR module: Absence of risk-based or intelligence-driven access reviews.
Complexity and pricing: May not be optimal for mid-sized organizations or those with specific workflow needs.

What Makes a Good Drata Alternative?

When comparing Drata alternatives, look for tools that:

Provide user access certification and manage entitlements effectively.
Automate user access reviews (UARs) to save time and reduce errors.
Integrate smoothly with identity providers like Okta, Azure AD, and HRIS platforms.
Offer risk and intelligence insights to help identify and prioritize access risks.
Support multi-level review workflows and allow for delegation.
Deliver audit-ready reporting for standards like SOC2, SOX, and ISO.
Scale with your organization and offer pricing and implementation options that fit your needs.

Top Drata Alternatives: Quick Comparison

Tool
Best for…
Key Strengths
Considerations
Ideal Tier
BalkanID
Identity-first, risk-based UAR
Graph-powered UAR, Lite vs Enterprise tiers, AI insights
Works standalone or run headless
SMB to Enterprise
ConductorOne
Workflow-first security teams
Real-time visibility
Less focused on entitlement mapping
Mid-market
Zilla Security
Continuous compliance control
SaaS + on-prem identity governance
Higher learning curve
Enterprise
Zluri
SaaS-heavy environments
App entitlement visibility + UAR
Less risk intelligence
Mid-market
Veza
Fine-grained permission modeling
Authorization graph, deep access visibility
Not identity-governance complete
Enterprise
Secureframe / Vanta / Sprinto
All-in-one compliance automation
Rapid audit readiness
Minimal UAR tooling
SMB to Mid-market

Deep Dive: Best Drata Alternatives

When searching for alternatives to Drata for identity governance, user access review (UAR) automation, and compliance, it's crucial to compare strengths, limitations, and the right fit for your organization’s needs. Below, you'll find concise head-to-head comparisons between Drata and leading competitors, including summary tables for quick reference.

Drata vs. BalkanID

Drata provides rapid audit readiness and easy compliance management, making it a first choice for startups and SMBs aiming for frameworks like SOC2, ISO, and HIPAA. Its automation focuses on evidence collection and streamlined checklists.

BalkanID, on the other hand, raises the bar for organizations with heightened identity governance and access review needs. It enables advanced, enterprise-grade UAR (User Access Review) workflows and risk-based reviews powered by AI—ideal for regulated industries or complex operational environments.

Integration Power
  • BalkanID integrates with over 200 applications and 60+ HR systems, far surpassing standard compliance automation.
  • It offers flexibility for rapid onboarding via a Lite tier and deeper customization through enterprise options.
Pricing Transparency
  • BalkanID’s pay-as-you-go structure starts at $1,000/month, supporting clear cost expectations for growing organizations.
Review Intelligence
  • Multi-level reviews, AI-generated recommendations, and fully customizable reporting empower teams to address both compliance and security challenges.
Potential Limitations
  • Organizations relying on non-web-based apps without APIs must either upload entitlement data manually or automate via custom playbooks.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
BalkanID
Compliance Frameworks
SOC2, ISO, HIPAA (pre-built)
Advanced UAR, risk-based reviews
Identity Governance
Minimal
Deep, AI-driven, scalable
Pricing Model
Subscription
Pay-as-you-go, transparent, $1,000/mo+
Integration Support
Broad, compliance focus
200+ apps, 60+ HR systems
UAR Automation
Basic
Enterprise-grade, customizable
Best Fit
SMBs, fast-growing tech
GRC, risk & IT compliance teams

BalkanID is most compelling for mature organizations ready to automate complex access controls and risk-driven access reviews.

Drata vs. ConductorOne

While Drata excels at getting organizations audit-ready, ConductorOne is purpose-built for teams demanding collaborative access certification and workflow automation. It creates seamless, delegated review processes that suit teams with distributed responsibilities.

Workflow Automation
  • ConductorOne automates delegated and bulk access reviews, helping organizations stay current with certifications as team members change.
  • User-friendly interfaces encourage participation from non-technical reviewers.
Integration Flexibility
  • Wide-ranging integrations make it a versatile fit, especially for businesses with an evolving SaaS ecosystem.
Advanced Controls
  • Custom policy configurations go beyond checklists, suiting complex environments—but these can require skilled setup.
Potential Limitations
  • The platform’s advanced features may present a learning curve.
  • Higher pricing may not suit all budgets, especially smaller teams.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
ConductorOne
Compliance Automation
Broad, fast
Workflow & access review-focused
Delegated Reviews
Minimal
Automated, bulk, collaborative
Integration
Compliance-centric
Flexible, wide-ranging
Custom Policy Support
Basic
Advanced (may need expertise)
Cost
Subscription
Can be higher
Ideal User
SMBs, compliance
Large/complex IT & Security

ConductorOne stands out for organizations with complex review cycles, distributed ownership, and the need for granular, collaborative certification workflows.

Drata vs. Zilla Security

Zilla Security attracts enterprises needing continuous compliance across complex, hybrid IT landscapes. While Drata is effective for streamlined, one-off audit prep, Zilla provides ongoing, real-time monitoring and powerful hybrid support.

Hybrid Identity Governance
  • Unified visibility covers both SaaS and on-prem systems, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.
Continuous Risk Oversight
  • Real-time SOD (Separation of Duties) conflict detection and risk alerts allow proactive control, not retrospective fixes.
Automated Evidence
  • Zilla’s platform produces audit evidence packages continuously, maintaining readiness at all times.
Potential Limitations
  • The complexity and breadth can require extensive setup and GRC expertise.
  • Smaller organizations may find onboarding demanding.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
Zilla Security
Compliance Automation
Fast, packaged
Continuous, real-time
Environment Coverage
SaaS focus
SaaS + on-prem (hybrid)
Real-Time Risk Alerts
Basic
Robust, risk-driven
Setup & Scalability
Simple
Complex, enterprise-grade
Best Fit
SMBs, tech
Large, hybrid enterprises

Zilla Security brings real-time, enterprise-ready oversight, setting it apart for complex organizations needing unified compliance and risk visibility.

Drata vs. Zluri

Zluri is designed for organizations awash in SaaS apps, providing granular entitlement management and automated access reviews on top of standard compliance tasks.

SaaS App Visibility
  • Zluri stands out with comprehensive visibility into usage and entitlements across SaaS portfolios.
Automated Compliance
  • Automated workflows lighten administrative loads and keep audits on track.
Moderate Cost
  • Offers strong value, especially for mid-sized teams facing SaaS sprawl.
Potential Limitations
  • Documentation and browser agent limitations may impact onboarding and troubleshooting.
  • Custom or niche integrations can require additional setup.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
Zluri
Compliance Coverage
SOC2, HIPAA, ISO
SaaS-centric reviews
SaaS Integration Depth
Standard
Extensive, granular entitlement
Pricing
Subscription
Moderate
Typical Buyer
SMBs, compliance
Mid-market SaaS teams

Zluri is a smart choice for SaaS-first organizations intent on scalable, audit-ready access management.

Drata vs. Veza

Veza delivers cutting-edge authorization and permission mapping. While Drata offers rapid compliance for straightforward setups, Veza brings detailed access modeling for highly regulated or security-conscious enterprises.

Deep Authorization Graphs
  • Veza provides visibility into the relationships and permissions across resources, identities, and applications.
Custom App & Analytics Support
  • Fast deployment for custom environments, plus actionable review insights for fine-tuned control.
Potential Limitations
  • Requires technical expertise for full deployment.
  • Pricing can be prohibitive for smaller budgets.
  • Documentation and community support are still maturing.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
Veza
Authorization Mapping
Basic
Advanced, detailed
Custom App Support
Minimal
Extensive
Analytics and Intelligence
Simple
Advanced, actionable
Cost
Subscription
Premium/Enterprise
Ideal Buyer
SMBs, compliance
Enterprises, high-security needs

Veza is best for enterprises needing unrivaled authorization analysis and control.

Drata vs. Secureframe / Vanta / Sprinto

Secureframe, Vanta, and Sprinto are optimized for SMBs or startups needing rapid, all-in-one compliance. Their quick-start templates and automated evidence gathering make them ideal for those new to compliance.

Fast Track to Audit
  • Pre-built frameworks (SOC2, ISO, HIPAA) get companies audit-ready quickly.
Automated Evidence Collection
  • Reduces manual labor and shortens audit cycles.
Potential Limitations
  • Minimal user access review tools and less focus on advanced identity governance.
  • Not intended for complex, regulated, or hybrid organizations.

Summary Table

Feature
Drata
Secureframe / Vanta / Sprinto
Compliance Frameworks
Broad
Pre-packaged
UAR Tooling
Basic
Minimal
Identity Governance
Limited
Not a core feature
Audit Evidence
Automated
Automated
Main Buyer
SMBs, tech
SMBs/startups, fast compliance

These platforms offer unmatched speed for audit readiness but may not support organizations with advanced access governance requirements.

This blend of narrative context and bullet-driven highlights keeps comparisons clear, concise, and actionable—empowering you to identify the best fit for your compliance and governance needs1.

Decision Framework: Choosing the Right Compliance Automation Tool

When evaluating Drata alternatives, it’s important to use a structured decision framework that addresses your organization’s unique requirements. Consider the following expanded questions as you compare solutions:

Do you prioritize robust User Access Review (UAR) capabilities?
Reflect on whether your organization needs advanced UAR features that go beyond basic compliance checks. Robust UAR functionality allows you to automate, schedule, and customize access reviews, ensuring that only the right users have access to sensitive systems and data. If comprehensive access certification and periodic reviews are critical for your risk management or audit processes, prioritize solutions that excel in this area.
Is graph-based risk insight important to your team?
Assess the value of having graph-powered analytics and visualizations that map relationships between users, entitlements, and resources. Graph-based insights provide a deeper understanding of how access is granted and where potential risks may exist within your environment. If your team benefits from clear, actionable intelligence that highlights high-risk access patterns, look for tools offering these advanced capabilities.
What’s the scale and complexity of your tech stack?
Consider the number of applications, systems, and integrations your organization manages. Larger, more complex environments often require solutions that can seamlessly connect with a wide range of identity providers, cloud platforms, and on-premises systems. Evaluate whether the tool can handle your current scale and is flexible enough to grow with your organization as your tech stack evolves.
Are you seeking a pricing fit, such as Lite versus Enterprise tiers?
Determine your budget and the level of functionality you require. Some platforms offer tiered pricing models, allowing you to start with a more accessible Lite version for rapid deployment and scale up to an Enterprise tier as your needs become more sophisticated. Consider whether the pricing structure aligns with your organization’s size, compliance maturity, and long-term goals.
How quickly do you need to deploy the solution?
Think about your implementation timeline and resource availability. If you need to address compliance requirements or risk management gaps urgently, prioritize solutions that offer rapid onboarding, pre-built integrations, and intuitive interfaces. Conversely, if you have the capacity for a more customized rollout, you may opt for a platform with deeper configuration options and advanced features.

By thoughtfully considering these factors, you can confidently select a compliance automation and identity governance platform that aligns with your organization’s operational needs, risk posture, and growth trajectory.

Quick Quiz

Use this quick, scenario-based quiz to help identify the best Drata alternative for your organization’s needs:
Question
Answer
01
Need delegated or multi-layer workflows?
Choose BalkanID or ConductorOne
02
Managing hundreds of SaaS apps?
Consider BalkanID
03
Require granular permission mapping?
Go with Veza
04
Looking for rapid audit readiness and all-in-one compliance automation?
Choose Secureframe, Vanta, or Sprinto
05
Want AI-driven risk alerts and recommendations?
Opt for BalkanID
06
Need strong SaaS and on-premise integration?
Select Zilla Security
07
Prefer a moderate price point with flexible tiers?
Explore BalkanID’s Lite and Enterprise options
08
Require deep entitlement and access insights for compliance?
Choose BalkanID or Zilla Security
09
Seeking intuitive user experience for access reviews?
Go with ConductorOne
10
Need customizable, audit-ready reporting for SOC2, SOX, or ISO?
Consider BalkanID, Zilla Security, or Secureframe

BalkanID vs Drata: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature
BalkanID
Drata
UAR Automation
Graph-powered, risk-based
Basic, compliance-focused
Identity & Entitlement Insights
Deep, AI-driven
Limited
Reviewer Workflows
Multi-level, delegated
Single-level
Audit Reports
Customizable, audit-ready
Standard templates
Pricing Tiers
Lite & Enterprise
Single-tier
Implementation Time
Rapid (Lite), scalable (Enterprise)
Standard

Real Results If You Switch

Organizations that transition to BalkanID experience tangible improvements across several key areas of compliance and identity governance:

Faster audit readiness
Teams report a significant reduction in manual spreadsheet work, as BalkanID automates evidence collection and streamlines audit preparation. This efficiency translates to quicker audit cycles and less time spent gathering, organizing, and validating access data for compliance frameworks like SOC2, ISO, and SOX.
Improved risk visibility
With AI-driven alerts and actionable recommendations, organizations gain deeper insight into access risks across their environment. BalkanID’s intelligent analytics help identify high-risk entitlements and unusual access patterns, empowering teams to proactively address vulnerabilities before they escalate.
Streamlined access reviews
The platform supports multi-level, periodic access review campaigns that can be tailored to fit complex business structures. This flexibility enables organizations to delegate reviews, automate reminders, and ensure that only the right users retain access to sensitive systems—reducing review fatigue and improving overall security posture.
Are you seeking a pricing fit, such as Lite versus Enterprise tiers?
Determine your budget and the level of functionality you require. Some platforms offer tiered pricing models, allowing you to start with a more accessible Lite version for rapid deployment and scale up to an Enterprise tier as your needs become more sophisticated. Consider whether the pricing structure aligns with your organization’s size, compliance maturity, and long-term goals.
How quickly do you need to deploy the solution?
Think about your implementation timeline and resource availability. If you need to address compliance requirements or risk management gaps urgently, prioritize solutions that offer rapid onboarding, pre-built integrations, and intuitive interfaces. Conversely, if you have the capacity for a more customized rollout, you may opt for a platform with deeper configuration options and advanced features.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Drata handle user access reviews?

Drata offers basic access review capabilities but lacks advanced, risk-based UAR modules and multi-level workflows.

What’s the cost difference between Drata and BalkanID?

BalkanID provides flexible pricing with Lite and Enterprise tiers, offering a more tailored fit for mid-market and enterprise teams.

Does BalkanID integrate with Okta, Azure AD, etc.?

Yes, BalkanID supports integrations with leading identity providers and HRIS systems.

How long does implementation take?

BalkanID’s Lite tier enables rapid onboarding, while the Enterprise tier supports scalable, custom deployments.

Find the right compliance automation fit—compare, evaluate, and take the next step with BalkanID.

Ready to experience risk-based access reviews and scalable compliance automation?

Download the UAR Comparison Checklist + Tool Evaluation Guide to streamline your buying process.