Cookie Preferences

When you visit websites, they may store or retrieve data in your browser. This storage is often necessary for the basic functionality of the website.

Accept All Cookies
Close
Cookies on this website

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

UAR Buyers Guide

What Are User Access Reviews?

A Simple Guide for Modern Teams and a Comparison of Top UAR Tools
BalkanID Logo Icon
User Access ReviewsWhen and WhyTop ToolsScalabilityRecommendationsFAQs

What Are User Access Reviews (UAR)?

Imagine an airport security checkpoint. Every passenger, whether an employee or contractor—arrives with luggage, representing their access to company resources. It’s up to the TSA agents—your security, GRC, or IT teams to inspect this luggage not just once, but at regular intervals throughout the passenger’s journey.

User Access Reviews (UARs) function much like these routine security checks. The goal isn’t to inspect every item blindly, but to identify risky baggage—access that’s outdated, unnecessary, or excessive. Just as TSA agents flag suspicious items, UARs help pinpoint access privileges that no longer align with a person’s role or responsibilities.

By consistently reviewing who has access to what, your organization ensures that only the right people retain the right permissions. It’s a crucial part of maintaining a secure, compliant, and well-managed environment—much like running a safe and efficient airport.

In today’s SaaS-driven landscape, the average organization relies on dozens of cloud platforms, SaaS applications, and internal tools to power day-to-day operations. With employees frequently joining, switching roles, or leaving the company, each change introduces critical implications for security, segregation of duties, and overall operational efficiency. Managing these transitions effectively is essential to maintaining a secure and streamlined digital environment.

Every access review software helps in the maintenance of the following:

Privilege Creep: When over time an employee gains more access than what is necessary for their role and purpose.

Meeting Compliance: Impertinent for SOC2, SOX, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI, NIST and more.

Risk Reduction: Minimize the chances of internal threats and avoid compromised accounts.

Ensuring the right access isn’t just a one-person job. As organizations grow, their digital footprints expand, the responsibility for conducting and overseeing User Access Reviews naturally spans multiple teams. This is primarily carried out by the following teams:

Security: Overlooks technical objectives and proper enforcement and identifies risky privileges or outliers.

GRC: Ensures alignment in terms of audits and various organization policies

IT: Deals with access changes and reviews

User Access Reviews are deeply interconnected with Identity Governance in many ways. It plays a foundational role in centralizing security processes such as authentication, entitlement and access management. It generates audit trails and documents every step. They ensure the proper alignment of access rights and avoid any possible gaps that could cause a security threat in the future.

When and Why Do You Need automated UAR Software?

UARs cover a wide range of applications and choosing the right one for your organization can significantly streamline operations and access management. Therefore, understanding when to utilize it plays a key role in correctly choosing the type of UAR software that fits your use case the best. Manually reviewing each access request might be manageable for smaller businesses, but as a company begins to scale, that process quickly becomes inefficient and unsustainable. What once seemed practical can turn into a drain on time and resources — and worse, introduce risks due to human error or oversight.

Missed Reviews: Manual processes are slow and often incomplete.

Audit Gaps: Hard to prove who had access, when, and why.

Human Error: Approvers rubber-stamp access or miss risky permissions.

Given these  limitations, it calls for a essential changes and improvements in the UAR tools for compliance teams. Overall, a more robust approach is evident especially during moments when the risks of missed or delayed reviews are amplified, and the value of automation becomes undeniable.

Some of the most common trigger moments for UAR automation include:

SOC2, SOX, ISO, PCI, DSS Audits: Auditors demand evidence of regular, complete reviews with proper trails and detailed accounts.

Mergers & Acquisitions: Swift identification and remediation of risky access privileges.

SaaS Sprawl: Multiple apps across multiple platforms to track.

Now we have established that the automation of access reviews plays a predominant role in the type of UAR software that you would pick. Another criteria that complements the automation is the scale at which you are operating. These are the various sizes that are primarily seen in the industry:

Growing Teams: Essentially organizations with 50+ employees and 10+ business apps.

Heavily Regulated Industries: SaaS, Finance, healthcare and any organization subject to external audits.

Organizations with sensitive data: UAR automation is necessary for organizations that deal with sensitive data and information.

Understanding team sizes is essential to fully leverage the capabilities and benefits of the UAR software to

Streamlined Audit Preparation:
UAR tools automate evidence collection, generate comprehensive audit trails, and provide ready-to-export reports. This reduces the time and effort needed to prepare for SOC2, SOX, ISO, PCI, DSS and other compliance audits—making audit cycles faster, smoother, and less stressful.

Proactive Access Management:
UAR tools enable real-time monitoring and automated responses to access changes — whether it's revoking permissions, escalating approvals, or updating roles. This ensures access rights stay aligned with current responsibilities, all without manual effort.

Automated Workflows:
Automated workflows enable quick identification and removal of unnecessary or risky access, reducing the window of exposure for potential threats.

Enhanced Visibility and Real-Time Reporting:
Gain a centralized, up-to-date view of who has access to what across all systems and applications. UAR platforms provide granular insights, customizable dashboards, and real-time alerts— track privilege changes, and demonstrate compliance at any moment.

Feature Comparison Table

Feature
Automated
Campaigns
Risk-Based
Insights
Budget
Friendliness
$
$$
$$
$$
$$$
$$$$
$$$$
$$$
$$
$$
$$
App
Integrations
On premises/Custom App Support
Audit
Readiness
Customizable
to Client Environment
Needs
Supports Natural Language Interface
Agentic
AI-driven autonomous operations

Top User Access Review Tools Compared

As organizations grow and regulatory demands intensify. Choosing the right UAR tool is no longer just about ticking a compliance box—it’s about enabling secure and scalable access governance across increasingly complex IT environments. Here are the top 10 tools to utilize for User Access Reviews:

1. BalkanID

BalkanID is purpose-built for User Access Reviews (UAR), offering both Lite and Enterprise options to suit organizations at different stages of growth. It’s especially well-suited for companies facing frequent audits or compliance requirements, providing a robust platform for managing, tracking, and automating access reviews across cloud and on premisses environments.

Strengths
Integrates with 200+ apps and 60+ HR systems.
Transparent, pay-as-you-go pricing starts at $1,000 per month.
Multi-level reviews and customizable reporting.
Access graph Copilot enforces least privilege and automates review workflows.
Automated risk insights, recommendations, priority inbox for faster, smarter reviews.
Proactive risk remediation via intuitive workflows and robust APIs.
Works standalone or run headless (fully automated using playbooks, SDKs, APIs without human intervention) in an agentic model.
Weaknesses
Non web based applications without APIs are not supported via direct integration, and will require manual upload of entitlements or playbook automation to be able to do UAR.

2. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is an identity governance platform designed for fast paced security teams who need to automate access reviews and reduce identity risk. Its Unified Identity Graph brings together access and permissions data from across the environment, supporting just-in-time access and full lifecycle management.

Strengths
Real-time visibility across cloud and on premises.
Automated, delegated access reviews and bulk approvals.
Flexible integrations with a wide range of apps.
Intuitively designed UX.
Weaknesses
May lack deep support for highly customized or legacy applications.
Advanced policy configurations may require additional setup.
Pricing barriers significantly impact budget-constrained organizations, limiting access to essential solutions.

3. Zilla Security

Zilla Security offers a unified identity security and governance platform with a strong focus on continuous compliance and risk-based access policies. Zilla’s AI-driven features help discover and maintain job-appropriate permissions, while its evidence generation simplifies audit preparation and compliance reporting.

Strengths
AI-driven role discovery and automated policy enforcement.
Real-time risk alerts and SOD conflict detection.
Automated audit evidence packages.
Weaknesses
Complexity may be challenging for smaller teams or those without dedicated GRC resources.
Initial setup and configuration can require significant effort for large environments.

4. Zluri

Zluri is a SaaS management platform with integrated UAR features, designed to provide IT asset visibility and streamline access reviews for mid-sized teams. Zluri is recognized for its user-friendly interface and rapid onboarding, making it accessible even to non-technical users.

Strengths
Seamless integration with a wide range of SaaS apps.
Automated compliance and security measures.
Seamless UI and quick onboarding
Weaknesses
Pricing may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with a large SaaS portfolio.
Limited documentation and browser agent limitations.
Support for niche or custom tools may require custom integrations.

5. Veza

Veza specializes in authorization graphing and fine-grained permissions management, offering deep visibility into access controls for both human and non-human identities. It’s a strong fit for organizations needing granular insights into who can take what action on which data, across cloud, SaaS, and systems on premises.

Strengths
Powerful graph-based visualization of permissions.
Supports both human and machine identities.
Rapid deployment and custom app support.
Advanced review intelligence and actionable insights.
Weaknesses
May require technical expertise for setup.
Documentation and community support are still growing.
Comparatively expensive, especially for organizations with limited budgets.

6. Saviynt

Saviynt is an enterprise-grade Identity Governance & Administration (IGA) platform with comprehensive UAR capabilities. It’s designed for large, regulated enterprises needing advanced compliance, lifecycle management, and real-time analytics.

Strengths
Advanced identity governance and compliance automation.
Highly scalable and configurable.
Weaknesses
Initial setup and deployment can be complex.
Training and onboarding materials may need improvement.
The solution is expensive and often requires professional services for deployment and customization.

7. SailPoint

SailPoint is a market leader in identity governance, serving global enterprises with mature access review and certification capabilities. Its platform excels at automating access certifications, managing SoD violations, and providing audit reports readily, making it a good choice for organizations with complex compliance and security needs.

Strengths
Comprehensive access certifications and policy management.
Automated provisioning and audit readiness.
Mature, enterprise-grade feature set.
Strong support for complex, global environments.
Weaknesses
Complexity of deployment and customization can be significant.
Some AI-driven recommendations and advanced features may come with additional costs beyond the base licensing.
High cost and ongoing maintenance expenses may deter SMBs.
Integrations with legacy systems can require additional development.

8. Okta (OIG)

Okta is an IAM platform with access review add-ons, ideal for hybrid and cloud-centric organizations. It offers seamless SSO, strong reporting, and automated provisioning, making it a popular choice for businesses looking to unify identity management and access governance within the Okta ecosystem.

Strengths
For organizations already using Okta as their IDP and SSO provider, OIG offers especially smooth onboarding and rapid integration, leveraging existing connections within the environment.
Strong compliance and reporting features.
User-friendly and widely adopted.
Easy onboarding for existing IDP and SSO customers due to seamless integration
Weaknesses
Some advanced authentication features are ambiguous or inconsistently documented.
Standalone UAR features may be limited compared to dedicated solutions.
Relatively expensive for SMBs.

9. Microsoft Entra

Microsoft Entra is Microsoft’s comprehensive identity governance solution, seamlessly integrated with Azure and Microsoft 365 environments. It is designed for organizations of all sizes that need to automate and scale user access reviews (UAR) across cloud and on-premises resources.

Strengths
Automated, recurring, and ad-hoc access reviews for users, guests, and privileged roles.
Multi-stage and delegated review workflows.
Weaknesses
Some advanced features require premium or suite licenses.
Best suited for organizations who already are a part of the Microsoft ecosystem.
Integration with non-Microsoft apps may require additional effort.

10. Pathlock

Pathlock is a leading access governance and compliance platform known for its fine-grained control and cross-application visibility. Its platform is ideal for enterprises with rigorous audit requirements, SoD controls, and a need for real-time risk analytics.

Strengths
Automates access reviews across multiple business-critical applications.
SoD monitoring and real-time dashboards.
Centralized audit trails and compliance evidence generation.
Weaknesses
Advanced capabilities may require tailored configuration and integration.
Complexity may be unnecessary for smaller organizations.
Focused on enterprises with significant compliance and audit needs.

11. SecurEnds

SecurEnds is a comprehensive identity governance and user access review platform designed to automate and simplify access certifications. It provides unified visibility into human and non-human identities, robust entitlement controls, and flexible integration options—making it a strong fit for organizations seeking to streamline compliance, reduce risk, and improve operational efficiency.

Strengths
Extensive pre-built and flexible connectors, including RPA-based options for legacy and non-API systems.
Centralized identity inventory with real-time insights into “who has access to what.”
Comprehensive lifecycle management: automated provisioning and deprovisioning, including Workday integration.
Weaknesses
Initial setup and configuration can require effort, especially for highly customized or complex environments.
Comparatively expensive for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.

What to Look for in a UAR Tool

Selecting the appropriate User Access Review (UAR) tool is essential for GRC leaders who want to streamline compliance, reduce risk, and ensure effective access governance. Consider the following points as a guide for choosing the right tool for you:

  • Automated Access Review Workflows
    • Choose tools that send reminders and manage reviewer assignments to minimize manual effort and errors.
    • Look for automated access revokes to increase efficiency.
  • Integration with HRIS, IDPs, and SaaS Apps
    • Ensure the tool connects seamlessly with HR systems, identity providers (such as Okta), and a wide range of SaaS and on-premises applications for comprehensive access visibility.
  • Role-Based Access Visibility
    • The platform should clearly map users to roles, resources, and entitlements, supporting policies like Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and the concept of least privilege.
    • Continuous monitoring for privilege creep and orphaned accounts helps maintain a secure environment.
  • Risk-Based Insights and Recommendations
    • Prioritize solutions with risk detection and actionable recommendations to help reviewers focus on the riskiest access first.
  • Pricing and Scalability
    • Assess the solution’s total cost, including licensing, implementation, and ongoing maintenance.
    • Ensure the tool can scale with your organization, supporting both Lite (for SMBs) and Enterprise (for large organizations) tiers without performance issues.

Key Takeaways & Recommendations

UAR software is essential for scalable, audit-ready governance:
In today’s fast-paced digital world, it is necessary to be prepared for audits while focusing on scalability as well. Investing in a reliable UAR tool means you’re not only staying compliant but also protecting your organization from unnecessary risks with ease and confidence.

Match the tool to your organization’s maturity:
Every organization is unique. Whether you’re managing a handful of SaaS apps or navigating an entire cloud ecosystem, choose the UAR solution that fits your compliance needs and team capacity.

For GRC teams, BalkanID stands out:
BalkanID combines audit readiness, automation, and risk visibility in one intuitive platform. It’s designed to empower GRC professionals to take control of access governance confidently and efficiently.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I prioritize when choosing my first UAR tool – features or ease of use?

Prioritize ease of use to get reviews running quickly and avoid tool abandonment. Look for intuitive setup and workflows you can master in days, not months. BalkanID’s streamlined interface balances essential features with simplicity.

Should I choose a specialized UAR tool or go with what my current security vendor offers?

This is like deciding between a dedicated sports car versus an SUV that "can handle everything." Think of your existing security vendor’s UAR module like an SUV—it’s versatile and covers a lot of ground, but isn’t built for peak performance in any one area. In contrast, BalkanID is like a dedicated sports car: it’s purpose-built for access reviews, delivering superior automation, broader integrations, and faster deployment. The real question is: do you want a tool that’s specialized and best-in-class for UAR, or are you satisfied with something that’s simply “good enough” across multiple functions?

How does company size shape the ideal UAR tool and setup?

A large enterprise with hundreds of apps and thousands of users needs a UAR solution that can automate complex processes and deliver detailed, scalable reporting. Smaller teams, on the other hand, look for simplicity and speed—tools that are fast to deploy and easy to manage without a big IT staff. BalkanID offers both Lite and Enterprise versions, so whether you need rapid self-service for a small team or advanced automation and reporting at scale, you get a solution personally curated to your company’s needs.

How do automated UAR tools improve audit readiness?

Automated UAR tools generate audit-ready reports, track every approval or denial, and create detailed audit trails. This makes it easy to demonstrate to auditors exactly who had access, when, and why—reducing the time and stress of audit preparation while ensuring continuous compliance with frameworks like SOC2, SOX, ISO, and HIPAA.

What triggers should prompt an organization to automate access reviews?

Automation becomes essential during major compliance audits, rapid company growth, mergers and acquisitions, or when your SaaS footprint expands beyond what manual reviews can realistically handle. These trigger moments exponentially increase the risk of oversight, making automation critical for timely, complete reviews.

Why is privilege creep dangerous, and how does a UAR tool help?

Privilege creep happens when employees accumulate permissions beyond what they need, increasing the attack surface for internal threats or compromised accounts. A modern UAR tool automatically flags these excessive privileges and guides reviewers to remediate them quickly—keeping access tightly aligned with current responsibilities.

Can UAR tools handle both SaaS and on-premises applications?

Yes, but capabilities vary by vendor. Tools like BalkanID offer broad integration across SaaS, cloud, and on-premises environments, while some solutions focus solely on cloud apps. Ensuring your UAR tool supports your full application stack is critical for a complete view of organizational access.

How do role-based access controls (RBAC) and UARs work together?

RBAC defines what permissions each role should have, while UARs verify that users in those roles still match their assigned access. Together, they form a powerful access governance strategy: RBAC proactively assigns least privilege, and UARs continuously validate it against real-world changes.

Is a natural language interface in UAR tools actually useful?

Absolutely. A natural language interface allows reviewers, especially non-technical managers, to interact with access data conversationally—asking questions like “Who has admin rights in Salesforce?”—making reviews faster, easier, and more intuitive. BalkanID’s support for natural language is a prime example of how this improves usability and adoption.

What is the difference between running UAR software headless versus with an interface?

Running UAR software headless means automating reviews entirely using playbooks, SDKs, or APIs without any human intervention, ideal for fully automated environments. Using the software with an interface allows humans to manually review, adjust, and certify access. The best tools—like BalkanID—support both, so you can start with manual reviews and scale to full automation when ready.

Why do integrations with HRIS and IDPs matter in UAR solutions?

HRIS and IDPs hold the authoritative source of truth for user identities and roles. Integrating these with your UAR tool ensures reviewers have accurate, real-time context for employment status, department, or role changes—critical for identifying orphaned accounts or unnecessary access and avoiding compliance gaps.

How can UAR automation help with mergers and acquisitions (M&A)?

During M&A, access privileges must be reviewed rapidly across both organizations to identify and remediate risky or redundant permissions. Automated UARs speed up this process, providing centralized visibility and actionable insights that are essential for secure, efficient integrations.

What are the costs involved in implementing a UAR tool?

Costs vary by vendor and complexity. Factors include licensing fees, professional services for setup and customization, training costs, and ongoing maintenance. Tools like BalkanID offer transparent pay-as-you-go pricing to minimize upfront investments, whereas legacy solutions may require significant professional service fees.

Resources & Further Reading

BalkanID UAR Lite - https://www.balkan.id/solutions/uar-lite
BalkanID Lifecycle mangement Lite - https://www.balkan.id/solutions/lifecycle-management-lite
BalkanID UAR- https://www.balkan.id/solutions/uar
BalkanID Lifecycle Management- https://www.balkan.id/solutions/lifecycle-management


Note:
The information and product comparisons provided in this document are based on publicly available data and vendor documentation as of June 2025. Sources include official product websites, user documentation, and industry reports. Features and pricing are subject to change. Organizations should verify details directly with vendors before making purchasing decisions.

Ready to simplify your access reviews and
strengthen your security posture?

Book a Demo with BalkanID today and see how effortless compliance can be.