Cookie Preferences

When you visit websites, they may store or retrieve data in your browser. This storage is often necessary for the basic functionality of the website.

Accept All Cookies
Close
Cookies on this website

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

10 Best User Access Review Practices for 2025

This blog outlines best practices to make user access reviews efficient, audit-ready, and aligned with modern compliance needs. It emphasizes automation, risk-based reviews, and a culture of accountability to reduce security risks and operational overhead.

Read this article
July 30, 2025
July 30, 2025

10 Best User Access Review Practices for 2025

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

This blog outlines best practices to make user access reviews efficient, audit-ready, and aligned with modern compliance needs. It emphasizes automation, risk-based reviews, and a culture of accountability to reduce security risks and operational overhead.

10 Best User Access Review Practices for 2025

Introduction: Why Access Reviews Still Fail in 2025

User Access Reviews (UARs) are systematic processes organizations use to periodically evaluate and validate user permissions across systems, applications, and data to ensure access aligns with current roles and responsibilities. These reviews serve as critical controls for maintaining compliance with regulatory frameworks including SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. If you require further assistance on such audits and compliance -

User Access Review for SOC2, HIPAA, and ISO Compliance

Despite being mandatory for most compliance frameworks, UARs continue to plague organizations with significant challenges:

  • Traditional access reviews remain time-consuming, error-prone, and often reduced to rubber-stamping exercises.
  • Over 50% of organizations experience insider attacks within twelve months, with many stemming from inappropriate access permissions that go undetected.
  • The fundamental problem isn't just about meeting compliance checkboxes—it's about creating actionable, audit-ready processes that genuinely strengthen security posture while reducing operational overhead.

This guide provides seven proven best practices for teams ready to move beyond perfunctory UARs toward strategic access governance that delivers measurable security and compliance value.

#1 — Define Clear Scope: Review What Actually Matters

A successful user access review starts with laser-sharp focus. Rather than overwhelming your team by reviewing every permission, zero in on what truly impacts your organization’s risk and compliance posture.

  • Pinpoint critical applications, privileged roles, and systems handling sensitive data.
  • Concentrate on high-risk areas: systems storing PII, financial data, intellectual property, and customer information.
  • Scope reviews by department, system criticality, and access level for targeted oversight.
  • Use a tiered strategy: privileged accounts (quarterly), sensitive systems (semi-annual), standard users (annual).

A targeted scope ensures your review efforts drive real security and compliance value.

#2 — Review Frequently, But Not Excessively

Finding the right cadence for access reviews is essential. Too infrequent, and risks go undetected; too frequent, and reviewers burn out.

  • Use quarterly reviews as a baseline, but adjust based on risk, size, and regulations.
  • Implement event-driven reviews for joiners, movers, and leavers to catch changes in real time.
  • Avoid annual “big bang” reviews that promote rubber-stamping.
  • Factor in system complexity, data sensitivity, and user turnover when setting your schedule.

Balanced frequency keeps your reviews relevant and effective without overwhelming your team.

#3 — Always Involve the Right Reviewers

No single stakeholder has all the context needed for accurate access decisions. Collaboration is key.

  • Include business managers, application owners, system administrators, and security teams.
  • Application owners understand both technical and business needs for access.
  • System owners provide insight on privileged permissions and technical context.
  • Enable delegation and backup reviewers to prevent bottlenecks and missed reviews.

Diverse perspectives lead to more accurate and defensible access decisions.

#4 — Provide Context to Reviewers

Context is the difference between an informed decision and a rubber-stamped one. Equip reviewers with actionable insights.

  • Show last login activity and usage patterns for each user.
  • Highlight application and data criticality levels.
  • Offer peer group comparisons to flag outliers.
  • Present historical access changes and justifications for transparency.

Empowered reviewers make smarter, risk-aware decisions that stand up to audit scrutiny.

#5 — Automate What Can Be Automated

Manual reviews are slow, error-prone, and unsustainable at scale. Automation is your force multiplier.

  • Automate data collection from HRIS, IDP, and SaaS applications.
  • Set up automated notifications, reminders, and approval routing.
  • Integrate with ITSM tools (like Jira, ServiceNow) for seamless revocation workflows.
  • Use AI and machine learning to flag anomalies and dormant accounts.

Automation frees your team to focus on exceptions and high-risk cases, not repetitive tasks.

#6 — Track Review Progress and Performance

Visibility into your review process is non-negotiable. Dashboards and metrics turn reviews into a continuous improvement opportunity.

  • Monitor completion rates, reviewer response times, and approval accuracy.
  • Track privileged access review rates to ensure regular oversight of high-risk accounts.
  • Log every decision with timestamps and exportable data for audit readiness.
  • Maintain comprehensive audit trails of reviewer actions and justifications.

Tracking progress ensures accountability and highlights areas for process optimization.

#7 — Build for Audit: Evidence, Not Just Approvals

Auditors want proof, not just a checklist. Build your process to generate robust, exportable evidence.

  • Archive all reviewer decisions, comments, and revocation actions.
  • Ensure reports are easily exportable for SOC 2, SOX, HIPAA, and ISO audits.
  • Retain detailed records: review parameters, user listings, approvals, and remediation tracking.
  • Conduct internal mock audits to identify and close documentation gaps.

An audit-ready approach reduces stress and demonstrates mature compliance practices year-round.

#8 — Enforce Least Privilege Continuously

Limiting access to only what’s necessary is a foundational security principle. Make least privilege an ongoing process, not a one-time event.

  • Regularly review and remove unnecessary permissions.
  • Flag and remediate privilege creep as roles evolve.
  • Use automation to detect and revoke unused or excessive access.
  • Educate users and managers on the importance of least privilege.

Continuous enforcement of least privilege minimizes attack surface and compliance risk.

#9 — Integrate UARs with Identity Lifecycle Management

User access reviews are most effective when tightly integrated with onboarding, offboarding, and role changes.

  • Sync UARs with HRIS and identity lifecycle events for real-time accuracy.
  • Trigger access reviews automatically when users join, move, or leave.
  • Ensure immediate revocation of access upon role change or departure.
  • Maintain up-to-date access inventories by automating data feeds.

Integration ensures your reviews reflect the current reality, not outdated org charts.

#10 — Foster a Culture of Accountability and Awareness

Access governance is not just a technical process—it’s a mindset. Build awareness and accountability across your organization.

  • Train reviewers and managers on the “why” behind access reviews.
  • Encourage questions and escalate suspicious access promptly.
  • Recognize teams that consistently complete accurate, timely reviews.
  • Communicate the impact of access governance on security and compliance outcomes.

A culture of accountability transforms access reviews from a checkbox to a business enabler.

By expanding your approach to include these ten best practices—with clear explanations, actionable steps, and a holistic mindset—you’ll build an access review process that’s efficient, resilient, and audit-ready.

Bonus Tip: Don't Wait Until Auditors Ask

  • Proactive access reviews reduce breach risk and enable continuous compliance monitoring.
  • Continuous review processes:
    • Lead to faster audits
    • Fewer compliance surprises
    • Stronger security posture
  • Continuous compliance means conducting reviews based on risk levels and business needs, not just regulatory deadlines.

Conclusion

These seven best practices transform user access reviews from compliance burdens into strategic security advantages. By defining clear scope, optimizing review frequency, engaging appropriate reviewers, providing context, automating workflows, tracking performance, and building audit-ready evidence, organizations achieve:

  • Better accuracy
  • Stronger compliance posture
  • Reduced operational overhead

Move beyond manual, spreadsheet-driven processes toward intelligent automation that scales with organizational growth. Organizations implementing these practices report significant improvements in review accuracy, compliance readiness, and security risk reduction.

Ready to automate access reviews and reduce audit fatigue? Book a demo with BalkanID to discover how intelligent automation can transform your access governance program.

Download our UAR checklist for audit-ready access reviews and start implementing these best practices in your organization today.